State v. McIntyre

Supreme Court of Louisiana
State v. McIntyre, 261 La. 821 (La. 1972)
261 So. 2d 228; 1972 La. LEXIS 5100
Another, Card, Charged, Defendant, Deprive, Dixon, Element, Entertain, Football, From, Game, Granting, Intent, Other, Permanently, Prevent, Services, Stolen, Theft, University, Ways, Writ

State v. McIntyre

Opinion of the Court

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable John S. Covington, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 9th day of October, 1972, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of s'aid Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A. M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

DIXON, J., dissents from the granting of this writ. Defendant is charged with the "theft of entertainment services” by entering a football game with the i. d. card of another. A necessary element of theft is the intent to deprive the other of the object permanently. LSU can still entertain with football. There are numerous lawful ways the university may prevent the transfer of i. d.’s, but nothing has been stolen in this case.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of Louisiana v. Amos W. McINTYRE
Status
Published