Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1972

Succession of Martel

Succession of Martel
Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided June 30, 1972 · Barham
262 La. 472; 263 So. 2d 729; 1972 La. LEXIS 5065
Succession of Martel

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted. There is no simultaneous death under our law for dispositions mortis causa. Presumptions of law require that in every event the husband or the wife predeceases the other. The substitution of the executor in case the husband predeceased his wife; the testatrix, at least makes the testament ambiguous. In such a case we should look to intent and are required to construe for testacy. This testament can be construed to have validity. We should at least remand for extrinsic evidence of testamentary intent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.