State ex rel. Grant v. Henderson
State ex rel. Grant v. Henderson
274 So. 2d 392; 1973 La. LEXIS 6674
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
State ex rel. Grant v. Henderson
Opinion of the Court
In re: Emile Grant and Albert Dixon applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for a stay order.
Writ denied. Find no error in ruling of trial court.
Concurring Opinion
concurs in the denial but only for the reason that relator had not specified the documents desired in under the subpoena duces tecum. It is relator’s obligation to determine and specify the documents he desires subpoenaed.
Concurring Opinion
concur in the denial. C.Cr.P. 732 requires the subpoena be issued if the documents are described and identified. However, the clerk and D. A. are not required to research the public records for the applicant.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.