State ex rel. Burse v. Henderson
State ex rel. Burse v. Henderson
Opinion of the Court
In re: J. C. Burse applying for writs of habeas corpus, certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.
Writ denied. Showing made does not warrant the exercise of this Court’s supervisory jurisdiction.
Dissenting Opinion
is of the opinion the writ should be granted. See Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed. 2d 811; Swenson v. Bosler, 386 U.S. 258, 87 S.Ct. 996, 18 L.Ed.2d 33; and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493.
Concurring Opinion
concurs in the denial because this application does not present a demand for an out-of-term appeal because of failure of state to inform him of availability of free lawyer at a time when applicant was prevented from appealing because of his indigency.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.