State ex rel. Harvey v. Baudoin
State ex rel. Harvey v. Baudoin
292 So. 2d 245; 1974 La. LEXIS 3322
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
State ex rel. Harvey v. Baudoin
Dissenting Opinion
is of the opinion the writ should be granted. The trial court has denied defendant-relator a preliminary examination under his “discretion” which actually is a simple finding that a bill of information has been filed. If “discretion” is the standard for granting a preliminary examination, it is abused here. However, “discretion” may not be the standard. See Pugh v. Rainwater, 5 Cir. 1973, 483 F.2d 778.
Opinion of the Court
In re: Frank Harvey applying for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Writ refused. The showing made is insufficient to warrant the exercise of our jurisdiction.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.