State ex rel. Royal v. Henderson
State ex rel. Royal v. Henderson
293 So. 2d 184; 1974 La. LEXIS 3797
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
State ex rel. Royal v. Henderson
Dissenting Opinion
is of the opinion an evi-dentiary hearing should be had. The majority refuses this application on the basis of the trial court’s opinion. The instrument — transcript of plea colloquy — relied upon by the trial judge is not even before this court for review. The trial judge simply adduced that counsel was competent because the judge knew counsel to be a competent lawyer. We have not reviewed anything that counters relator’s allegations.
Opinion of the Court
In re: Ernest Royal applying for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our jurisdiction.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.