Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Bertrand
Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Bertrand
293 So. 2d 192; 1974 La. LEXIS 3660
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Bertrand
Opinion of the Court
In re: Paul M. Bertrand applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Iberia. 290 So.2d 3S0.
Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law.
Dissenting Opinion
dissents from denial. Although the issue is characterized as factual (and therefore not ordinarily regarded as ground for certiorari), the majority and dissenting opinions of the court of appeal, and the trial judge’s opinion (entitled to great weight in absence of manifest error) show that the third-party plaintiff is entitled to rescission because of redhibitory defect.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.