In re: Samuel W. Richardson applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. Considering the colloquy at the time of the plea bargain agreement, and surrounding circumstances, the judgment of the trial court is correct.

is of the opinion an evi-dentiary hearing is required. There is no showing of compliance with Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274. See dissent in State ex rel. Billiot v. Henderson, No. 54,644 our docket this date, 294 So.2d 822.

concurs in the denial. The Boykin examination was deficient, but the plea was the result of a plea bargain, the implication of which indicates an intelligent and informed plea.