Lauland v. Trauth
Lauland v. Trauth
302 So. 2d 624; 1974 La. LEXIS 4128
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Lauland v. Trauth
Opinion of the Court
In re: Kenneth B. Trauth applying for writs of mandamus, certiorari, review and all other necessary writs.
Not Considered. Since the time for filing writ expired before the extension was granted; the application is not timely. See Wischer v. Madison Realty Co., 242 La. 334, 136 So.2d 62 (1962).
Concurring Opinion
concurs; Wischer v. Madison is not applicable, but applicant has not sought review from the court of appeal, and must exhaust his remedies before application to this court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.