State ex rel. Tubbs v. Henderson
State ex rel. Tubbs v. Henderson
Opinion of the Court
In re: Joe Nathan Tubbs applying for Writs of Certiorari and Habeas Corpus.
Writ refused. No merit in the application. The 1969 sanity commission finding negates relator’s present complaint of incapacity.
Dissenting Opinion
is of the opinion the writ must be granted and a hearing ordered. Applicant has never had a hearing or a ruling on the issue now presented. The issue here is whether applicant’s mental illness when he pleaded guilty precluded a free, voluntary & informed plea. The issue is not the same as that in a plea of insanity (whether defendant understands the nature of the offense and can assist counsel). Prior court proceedings have determined his capacity under La. law to stand trial, but not his capacity, under Federal standards, to plead guilty.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.