Fielding v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange
Fielding v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange
334 So. 2d 217
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Fielding v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange
Opinion
Virginia FIELDING
v.
CASUALTY RECIPROCAL EXCHANGE.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Writ denied. The facts found by the Court of Appeal show no error of law in its judgment.
TATE, J., dissents, agreeing with the dissenting judges in the Court of Appeal, since the trial court's factual finding was supported by factual evidence found by it to be credible.
DIXON, J., dissents from denial.
CALOGERO, J., dissents.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.