Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1976

Duhon v. Saloom

Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided February 6, 1976 · No. 57401 · Calogero, Dennis, Dixon, Granted, Should

325 So. 2d 794; 1976 La. LEXIS 4766 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

LeCompte v. State DHHR-So. LA. Med. Center (La. Ct. App. 1998)
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1990)
Hero Lands Co. v. Borello (La. Ct. App. 1984)
Nathan v. Carter (La. Ct. App. 1979)
Duhon v. Saloom (La. 1976)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Dissenting Opinion

DIXON, J.,

is of the opinion the Court of Appeal has misinterpreted Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co., 261 La. 1080, 262 So.2d 328 and the factual issue on the *795plea of prescription should have been submitted to the jury.

CALOGERO, J., is of the opinion this writ should be granted. DENNIS, J., is of the view that writ should be granted.

Opinion of the Court

In re Anna Mae Bower Duhon applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Lafayette, 323 So.2d 202.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.