is of the opinion the writ should be granted because the jury was not clearly instructed that excessive force by the bartender would completely obviate the theory of self-defense; also there was evidence from which the jury could have found reasonably that the bar owner was guilty of primary negligence in either employing a person with dangerous propensities or in not stopping the argument before the injury occurred.

In re: Thomas C. Morris applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, 335 So.2d 75, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu.

Writ denied. The result is correct.