State v. Gray
State v. Gray
Concurring Opinion
concurs in the grant, noting further that $150,000 is on the face of the record excessive. The purpose of bail is to insure the presence of defendant at trial. On the ruling on the motion to reduce bail, the trial judge did not allude to any reason for such a high bail.
Opinion of the Court
In re: John L. Gray applying for Writs of Certiorari, Mandamus and Prohibition.
Writ granted. Bail reduced to $15,000. The State is entitled to provoke a hearing to increase the bail upon good cause shown. La.C.Cr.P. art. 321.
Dissenting Opinion
is of the opinion that this Court should not reduce bail upon the unilateral representation of the accused, without a response by the State and without a record of the evidence upon which the trial judge based the bail amount.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.