State v. Conerly
State v. Conerly
342 So. 2d 671; 1977 La. LEXIS 5455
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Conerly
Opinion of the Court
In re: Murrill Conerly, applying for writs of certiorari, review, prohibition and mandamus and Stay Order.
Writ denied. The ruling of the trial judge is correct.
Concurring Opinion
concur, believing the issue is not posed until after the witnesses testify on direct for the state; if the defendant is then denied access to the grand-jury testimony of these witnesses for purposes of cross-examination, a substantial confrontation right may be denied him. See Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 94 S.Ct. 1105, 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.