Thornton v. Moran
Cases that cite this one
21 later published cases cite this decision.
- McCullough v. Regional Transit Authority (La. Ct. App. 1992)
- Fontenot v. PATTERSON INS. (La. Ct. App. 2007)
- Randy Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance Company (La. Ct. App. 2007)
- Wooley v. Lucksinger (La. Ct. App. 2009)
- Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury (La. Ct. App. 2006)
- John Hebert, Et Ux. v. Rapides Parish Police Jury (La. Ct. App. 2006)
- Tellis v. Lincoln Parish Police Jury (La. Ct. App. 2005)
- Madison v. ERNEST N. MORIAL CONVENT. CENTER (La. Ct. App. 2002)
- Mossy Motors v. Sewerage and Water Bd. (La. Ct. App. 1999)
- Cornish v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEVELOP. & DEV. (La. Ct. App. 1994)
- American Cas. Co. v. Illinois Cent. Gulf RR Co. (La. Ct. App. 1992)
- Arshad v. City of Kenner (La. 2012)
- Davis v. Witt (La. 2003)
- Hays v. State (La. Ct. App. 2003)
- Powell v. Regional Transit Authority (La. 1997)
- Buffinet v. Plaquemines Parish Com'n (La. Ct. App. 1994)
- Smiley v. Sikes (La. Ct. App. 1989)
- Justin v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS EX REL. MORIAL (La. Ct. App. 1986)
- Bickham v. Goings (La. Ct. App. 1984)
- Williams v. City of New Orleans (La. Ct. App. 1983)
- Aubert v. Charity Hospital of Louisiana (La. Ct. App. 1978)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In re: Frank L. Thornton and Government Employees Insurance Company applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, 341 So.2d 1136, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge.
Writ granted. Judgment of court of appeal reversed; case remanded to court of appeal to resolve the differences in the factual findings between the jury and the judge in these consolidated cases and to render a single opinion based upon the record. La.Const. art. 5, § 10(B). Rights of parties to reapply for writs in accordance with law after court of appeal renders decision in accordance with views herein expressed are reserved.
Dissenting Opinion
dissents from this ex parte in chambers reversal of the judgment of the court of appeal without a hearing and opportunity for the parties to be heard.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.