In re: Richard A. Tonry et al. applying for writ of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ denied. The trial judge was correct in ruling that the court has jurisdiction to try the action for nullity of the prior judgment. Further, the exception of no cause of action was properly overruled as to the action for nullity; we do not reach the exception as to other demands of plaintiff, and make no ruling thereon, since the exception must be overruled if the petition states a cause of action as to any demand.

concurs in the denial. The trial court properly overruled the exception of no cause of action to annul a judgment allegedly obtained fraudulently, for whatever consequential effect the judgment may have. Our denial of this application is without prejudice to the right of the defendant to urge defenses he may have in the basic election contest suit.

*1387The primary defenses we do not pass upon are that the state court allegedly does not have jurisdiction to disturb the election of a member of Congress who has taken office, and that under state law the basic election contest suit is abated, since the nominee of the primary election was placed on the ballot of the general election. See La. R.S. 18:364, 1072, as of the date of the suit.