Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1977

Fleming v. Romero

Fleming v. Romero
Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided May 6, 1977 · No. 59609 · Are, Granted, Sanders, Should, Summers, Tate
345 So. 2d 50; 1977 La. LEXIS 5002 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Fleming v. Romero

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

In re: Arthur H. Fleming applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, 342 So.2d 881, Third Circuit Parish of Iberia.

Application denied; the result is correct.

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., are of the opinion that a writ should be granted.

Dissenting Opinion

TATE, J.,

dissents from the denial of the writ: I am of the opinion that the defendant’s agreement to sell was timely accepted in writing by the plaintiff’s attorney (as well as the defendant’s acceptance of a deposit), for the reasons stated by the trial court.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.