Fleming v. Romero

Supreme Court of Louisiana May 6, 1977

Fleming v. Romero, 345 So. 2d 50 (La. 1977)

1977 La. LEXIS 5002

Are, Granted, Sanders, Should, Summers, Tate

Opinion of the Court

In re: Arthur H. Fleming applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, 342 So.2d 881, Third Circuit Parish of Iberia.

Application denied; the result is correct.

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., are of the opinion that a writ should be granted.

Dissenting Opinion

TATE, J.,

dissents from the denial of the

writ: I am of the opinion that the defendant’s agreement to sell was timely accepted in writing by the plaintiff’s attorney (as well as the defendant’s acceptance of a deposit), for the reasons stated by the trial court.

Reference

Full Case Name: Arthur H. FLEMING v. John J. ROMERO
Cited By: 4 cases
Status: Published