State v. Hagerty
State v. Hagerty
347 So. 2d 245; 1977 La. LEXIS 5561
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Hagerty
Dissenting Opinion
concurs in the denial, the representations in the application indicate that the prescription plea has merit. However, because the application is incomplete, this court sought and accepted the response of the prosecution that the record shows a motion for continuance, filed by defendant, effected a suspension of prescription.
Opinion of the Court
In re: John B. Hagerty applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.
Writ denied. Showing made does not warrant the exercise of supervisory relief. Adequate remedy by review in the event of conviction.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.