assigns as additional concurring reasons that the pleadings show landowner was seeking damages based on the pre-compromise conduct. Our denial was not intended to approve any construction of the compromise as barring the landowner from recovery of damages claimed by the landowner caused by post-compromise conduct.

In re: Clarence Leon Richey applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, 345 So.2d 260, Third Circuit, Parish of Acadia.

Writ denied. No error of law under the pleadings.