In re the Succession of Dunham
In re the Succession of Dunham
347 So. 2d 252; 1977 La. LEXIS 5805
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
In re the Succession of Dunham
Opinion of the Court
In re: Katharine Oldham Dunham applying for supervisory writs.
Writ denied. No abuse of discretion by trial judge. We express no opinion as to the liability for the payment of the cost of the inventory.
Concurring Opinion
has serious doubts concerning the propriety of the inventory order, but because of the delay involved in appellate review concurs in the denial.
Dissenting Opinion
is of the opinion the writ should be granted. Respondent’s right is to traverse the descriptive list, not to obtain authorization for an ádditional inventory.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.