State ex rel. Guste v. City of New Orleans
State ex rel. Guste v. City of New Orleans
Opinion of the Court
In re: State of Louisiana, ex reí. Guste, Attorney General and Representatives R. Harmon Drew and B. F. O’Neal applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 353 So.2d 1117.
Not considered. Although the judgment below appears to be incorrect, it has become final because no application for rehearing was filed in the court of appeal.
Concurring Opinion
concur. Due to the failure of the plaintiffs to apply for rehearing in the court of appeal, by statute the judgment in favor of the defendants has become final, although in our view it is erroneous. However, while the judgment may be res judicata as to the parties as to past payments, it is not res judicata as to persons not parties to these proceedings, Louisiana Civil Service League v. Forbes, 258 La. 390, 246 So.2d 800 (1971), and as to parties it is arguably not res judicata as to future payments, see State v. American Sugar Ref. Co., 108 La. 603, 32 So. 965 (1902), and the recent Firefighters decisions.
Concurring Opinion
concur. The judgment herein became final before application for writs was filed in this court.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE of Louisiana ex rel. William J. GUSTE, Jr., Attorney General and Representatives R. Harmon Drew and B. F. O'Neal v. The CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, the Honorable Moon Landrieu, Terrence R. Duvernay and Henry G. Simmons
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published