The defendant was convicted of two counts of armed robbery and ultimately sentenced as a multiple offender to fifty years imprisonment on each count.

He has appealed to this Court, relying on one assignment of error made to the denial of his motion for a new trial.

We have reviewed the motion and concluded that it presents no reversible error.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

(dissenting).

I respectfully dissent.

The offenses (two dissimilar armed robberies) should have been severed. State v. Carter, 352 So.2d 607 (La. 1977).