State v. Bouzigard
State v. Bouzigard
362 So. 2d 1384; 1978 La. LEXIS 6691
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Bouzigard
Dissenting Opinion
dissents.
The trial court’s extensive interrogation of the accused amounted to a comment upon the evidence and an expression of disbelief in the accused’s credibility in his trial defense. This could not be harmless error, destroying as it did the accused’s principal defense.
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed.
Concurring Opinion
concurs.
The trial judge is not prohibited from interrogating witnesses.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.