Chaisson v. Thomas
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Chaisson v. Thomas, 365 So. 2d 229 (La. 1978)
1978 La. LEXIS 6939
Dixon, Tate
Chaisson v. Thomas
Concurring Opinion
concurs. Our writ grant was obviously designed to permit the trial judge to rule on the merits of the plaintiff’s objection to discovery of some matters requested as unduly oppressive or as not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of relevant evidence.
070rehearing
would grant a rehearing, being of the view that the writ was improvidently granted.
Opinion of the Court
In re: Defendants-Respondents applying for rehearing.
Application for rehearing denied.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Joel T. CHAISSON v. Lanny THOMAS, Charles A. Ferguson, Walter G. Cowan, Ashton Phelps, and the Times-Picayune Publishing Corp.
- Status
- Published