Succession of Hearn
Succession of Hearn
415 So. 2d 215
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Biggs v. Hatter (La. Ct. App. 2012)
- In re Estate of Daniel (D.C. 2003)
- Valentine v. Elliott (D.C. 2003)
- Miller v. Succession of Cupples (La. Ct. App. 1988)
- Succession of Mangle (La. Ct. App. 1984)
- Sanders v. Rhodes (La. Ct. App. 1984)
- Sutherland v. Time Saver Stores, Inc. (La. Ct. App. 1983)
- West v. Gajdzik (La. Ct. App. 1982)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
SUCCESSION OF Archie G. HEARN.
Mallery Clotille Hearn MUSSELWHITE
v.
Mamie Slack HEARN, et al.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Denied. Result is correct.
DIXON, C. J., and MARCUS, J., concur in the denial, La.App., 412 So.2d 692, being of the opinion that the 5 year prescription period began to run from the date of the judgment of possession (Feb. 13, 1975) but was interrupted by plaintiff's pleading filed in the succession proceedings on Nov. 23, 1979.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.