Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1982

State v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided November 19, 1982 · Application, Calogero, Dixon, Does, Executory, From, Jurisdiction, Relate, Sentence, Shall, Thing, Transferring, Whether

431 So. 2d 1050; 1982 La. LEXIS 12563 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Mims (La. Ct. App. 1989)
State v. McDonald (La. Ct. App. 1985)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Transferred. In this writ application, the relator seeks review of the revocation of his probation. He does not seek to reverse or modify his conviction or sentence. Hence, this is not a writ application relating to a conviction or a sentence, and does not constitute a matter over which this Court has exclusive jurisdiction. It was properly filed originally in the court of appeal. La.Const. 1974, Art. 5 § 5(E). See State v. James Williams, 418 So.2d 1351.

DIXON, C.J., and CALOGERO, J., dissent from the order transferring this application. The only thing this application does “relate to” is the sentence, to determine whether it shall be made executory, and this Court has exclusive jurisdiction.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.