State Ex Rel. Tuesno v. Maggio
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Tuesno (La. Ct. App. 1984)
- Roderick Wilson v. C.M. Lensing and Attorney General of Louisiana (5th Cir. 1991)
- Wilson v. Lensing (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1991)
- State v. Barnes (La. Ct. App. 1986)
- State v. Fraley (La. Ct. App. 1986)
- State v. Felton (La. Ct. App. 1986)
- State v. Garland (La. Ct. App. 1986)
- State v. Calway (La. Ct. App. 1986)
- State v. Waldron (La. Ct. App. 1986)
- State v. Sparks (La. Ct. App. 1986)
- State v. Duncan (La. Ct. App. 1986)
- State v. Lutz (La. Ct. App. 1986)
- State v. Polk (La. Ct. App. 1986)
- State v. Dakin (La. Ct. App. 1986)
- State v. Thomas (La. Ct. App. 1985)
- State v. Turner (La. Ct. App. 1985)
- State v. Bruno (La. Ct. App. 1985)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
STATE of Louisiana, ex rel., Ruffes J. TUESNO
v.
Ross MAGGIO, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Granted. The trial court was without jurisdiction to impose an enhanced sentence as an order of appeal had been entered prior to imposition of the enhanced sentence. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 916; State v. Sharper, 383 So.2d 1248 (La. 1980). Accordingly, the enhanced sentence is set aside and the original sentence of 15 years is reinstated. In the event defendant is resentenced as a multiple offender, his right to appeal his enhanced sentence is reserved to him.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.