Procell v. Insurance Co. of North America
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Comeaux v. Roy (La. Ct. App. 1987)
- Graham v. Sequoya Corp. (La. Ct. App. 1985)
- Vermilion Parish Sch. Bd. v. Weaver Exploration Co. (La. Ct. App. 1985)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In Re Wilmer Procell, applying for Writ of Certiorari or Review, to the Court of Appeal Third Circuit, No. 82-374; Parish of Sabine, Eleventh Judicial District Court, No. 32,207. La.App., 425 So.2d 860.
Denied.
Concurring Opinion
concurs. This decision simply holds that plaintiff did not prove present disability. Since relator was paid benefits for a period of time after the accident, he may be able to reassert the claim if his residual condition caused by this accident becomes disabling in the future.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.