Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1984

State v. Manshack

State v. Manshack
Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided February 16, 1984 · Lemmon
444 So. 2d 1212; 1984 La. LEXIS 8195 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Manshack

Opinion of the Court

In Re ROGER DALE MANSHACK, applying for Writ of Review, to the Court of Appeal Second Circuit, No. 15,625-KA, c/w (15,546-KA & 15,601-KA); Parish of DeSo-to, Eleventh Judicial District Court, NO. 48,634.

Case Below: 442 So.2d 1195.

Denied.

Concurring Opinion

LEMMON, Justice,

concurs.

We have properly relegated to post-conviction proceedings relator’s claim of insufficient assistance of counsel in failing to rebut inaccurate information in the presen-tence investigation report. If relator can show that the “crime spree” referred to in the report is inaccurate, he is entitled to be resentenced. However, the trial court could have avoided this problem by telling defendant on the record the substance of the contents of the report and by specifically affording defendant an opportunity on the record to rebut any inaccurate statement.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.