Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1984

D'Amico, Curet & Dampf v. Jumonville

D'Amico, Curet & Dampf v. Jumonville
Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided November 16, 1984
458 So. 2d 903 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
D'Amico, Curet & Dampf v. Jumonville

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Granted. The court of appeal erred in refusing to consider relator’s application for rehearing. Uniform Rule 2-18.7 applies only when application for supervisory writs either has been denied or has been granted for subsequent disposition after the return date fixed for submission of the case.

*904In the present ease, the court granted the application as part of a peremptory-reversal. Therefore, Rule 2-18.7 does not apply, and relator is entitled to apply for a rehearing.

Accordingly, the case is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration of relator’s application for rehearing.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.