State v. Shea
State v. Shea
474 So. 2d 439; 1985 La. LEXIS 10294
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Shea
Opinion of the Court
dissenting.
I respectfully dissented from the original majority opinion because it failed to persuade me that the rule of Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981), should be applied prospectively only. I was persuaded to the contrary by Justice Marcus’ opinion on rehearing, however, and at that time joined the majority.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.