Faustina Pipe Line Co. v. Hebert
Faustina Pipe Line Co. v. Hebert
474 So. 2d 1295
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Faustina Pipe Line Co. v. Hebert
Dissenting Opinion
would grant the writ on the issue of severance damages. The mere existence of a pipeline absent any eviden-tiary support of damage will not support an award for severance damages. Furthermore, encasement costs of a pipeline under unplanned streets in an imaginary subdivision is speculative.
Opinion of the Court
In re Faustina Pipe Line Co.; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Number 84-459; Parish of Lafayette 15th Judicial District Court Div. “H” Number 83-0760.
Prior report: 469 So.2d 483.
Denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.