Osborne v. Stone

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Osborne v. Stone, 476 So. 2d 809 (La. 1985)
1985 La. LEXIS 9727
Bring, Calogero, Dixon, Grant, Writ

Osborne v. Stone

Opinion of the Court

In re: Osborne, Milton, Jr.; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; to the Court of Appeal, 472 So.2d 223, First Circuit, Number CA 84 0517; Parish of East Baton Rouge 19th Judicial District Court Div. “H” Number 261,717.

Granted. The contention of laches may not be raised by exception; assuming without deciding that laches' is available in Louisiana, it may be urged only as an affirmative defense. See LSA-C.C.P. art. 1005, Comment (e). The judgments of the trial court and Court of Appeal are vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings according to law.

Concurring Opinion

DIXON, C.J.,

concurs in the grant and reversal and remand. There is no “laches” in La., C.C. 3457. I would remand to determine whether plaintiff abandoned his position or waived his rights.

CALOGERO, J., would simply grant the writ and bring the case up.

Reference

Full Case Name
Milton OSBORNE, Jr. v. Jesse N. STONE, Jr. individually and/as President of the Southern University System B.K. Agnihotri individually and/as Dean of Southern University School of Law and the Southern University Board of Supervisors
Cited By
6 cases
Status
Published