Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1986

State ex rel. Poole v. Whitley

Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided March 7, 1986 · Calogero, Dennis, Dixon, Joining, Reasons

483 So. 2d 1005; 1986 La. LEXIS 5843 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Granted. The matter is remanded to the trial court for a complete evidentiary hearing on the issue of relator’s mental capacity at the time of his guilty plea.1 The trial court should receive the testimony of the doctors who had been appointed to the sanity commission on October 19, 1976, if they are available, and any other evidence bearing on relator’s mental capacity at the time he withdrew his plea of not guilty by reason of insanity and pleaded, guilty on December 14, 1976. After the hearing, the trial judge should rule on relator’s capacity at the time of his plea. If the trial judge does not set aside the guilty plea, relator may seek further review.

. Once the question of defendant’s mental capacity has been raised, La.C.Cr.P. Art. 642 prohibits any further steps in the prosecution until the defendant is found to have the mental capacity to proceed. In the present case, the record before us is unclear whether the judge, after appointing the sanity commission, found that relator had the mental capacity to proceed before allowing him to withdraw his insanity plea and to enter a guilty plea.

Concurring Opinion

DIXON, C.J.,

concurs, believing that it is implicit, in view of CCrP 642 that the court *1006determine that the trial judge found the defendant had the mental capacity to proceed.

CALOGERO and DENNIS, JJ., concur, joining in the Chief Justice’s reasons.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.