State v. Watson
State v. Watson
Dissenting Opinion
dissent from the order, perceiving no error sufficiently grave to require this court’s exercising jurisdiction.
Opinion of the Court
In re Watson, Jimmy Ralph; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “N”, Nos. 88-1157, 88-1158; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 88-KW-0864.
Granted. The rulings of the Court of Appeal and district court are reversed in part. The district court’s quashing the subpoenas duces tecum except as regards items 1, 2 and 6 is reversed and the motion to quash denied as to items 3, 4 and 5. These items are not internal documents made in connection with the investigation of this case.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.