Munsterman v. Crawford
Munsterman v. Crawford
Opinion of the Court
In re Louise Jennings, Charles L. Crawford, Jr., Dabney Ewin, Gordon Ewin, James P. Ewin, Jr., James Scott, Leroy H. Scott, Jr., Dr. Walter L. Crawford, Esmond S. Grosz, Charles Scott and John Deblieux, applying for reconsideration of writ denied 1/6/89, 535 So.2d 743, from the Third Circuit Court of Appeal, No. CA87-0676, Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Evangeline, Section A, No. 40,400-A.
Reconsideration denied. The judgment is final. See C.C.P. art. 2166(D).
Dissenting Opinion
dissents. There is no property right created by the judgment in this case. I would therefore have this Court exercise its supervisory judgment, grant the application and give more thorough consideration to the assignments of error and arguments presented by relator.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.