State v. Vappie
State v. Vappie
Opinion of the Court
In re Vappie, Rhodita; Loubier, Belinda; Reed, Larry;—Defendants); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs; Parish of Orleans Criminal District Court Div. “C” Number 330-118; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Number 88KW-0529.
Denied.
Concurring Opinion
concurs, but notes that the trial court may permit relator to reopen the hearing on the motion to suppress evidence. Although the trial judge took the efficient approach, relator’s argument is technically correct, and any prejudice can be avoided by reopening the hearing, now
Dissenting Opinion
would grant and notes additionally that he believes the district court judge is yet at liberty to reopen the hearing on the motion to suppress on the terms and conditions that had been set forth by the trial court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.