Stuart v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.
Stuart v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.
Concurring Opinion
concur in the denial of rehearing, but would prefer that this Court write an opinion addressing the issue whether a timely motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict impliedly includes an alternative motion for a new trial so that the trial court can grant either relief.
MARCUS, J., would grant the rehearing.
Opinion of the Court
In re Stuart, Cecil L.; Roussel, Marilyn Peterson; Stuart, Harvey; Stuart, Cecil Jr.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of cer-tiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW88 1942; Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No.' 53318, 58319.
Prior report: La.App., 544 So.2d 78.
Granted. Judgment of the court of appeal is reversed; trial court order for new trial is reinstated.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Cecil L. STUART v. COOPER TIRE AND RUBBER CO.
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published