State v. Matthews
State v. Matthews
554 So. 2d 1237; 1990 La. LEXIS 199; 1990 WL 3596
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Matthews
Concurring Opinion
concurs, but disagrees with the court of appeal that a criminal defendant may not reraise the double jeopardy issue on appeal because the court was bound by its pretrial denial of supervisory writs on the issue. A considered writ denial may indicate the same result on appeal, but does not compel such result, particularly if a new argument is raised.
Opinion of the Court
In re Matthews, Curtis; — Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, and Mandamus and Prohibition; to the /Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Number KA 8986; Parish of Orleans Criminal District Court Div. “D” Number 280-484.
Prior report: 549 So.2d 943.
Denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.