State v. Prophet
State v. Prophet
558 So. 2d 556; 1990 La. LEXIS 774; 1990 WL 35019
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Prophet
Opinion of the Court
In re Prophet, Stanley; Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KA88 1782; Parish of East Feliciana, 20th Judicial District Court, Div. “A” No. 9-86-48306.
Prior report: La.App., 552 So.2d 773.
Denied.
Concurring Opinion
concurs in denial.
“Harmlessness” under Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967) does not turn on whether the erroneously admitted evidence is “cumulative.”
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.