State ex rel. Priestly v. State
State ex rel. Priestly v. State
558 So. 2d 558; 1990 La. LEXIS 625; 1990 WL 18660
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
State ex rel. Priestly v. State
Opinion of the Court
In re Priestly, Wayne D.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory, remedial and mandamus writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “I", No. 287-316.
The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of Boykin and sentencing transcripts he claims to have filed on or about October 13, 1989. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.