Rose v. Rose
Rose v. Rose
559 So. 2d 1372; 1990 WL 48261
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Rose v. Rose
Opinion of the Court
In re Rose, Franklyn D.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or re
Prior report: La.App., 535 So.2d 1167.
Not considered, not timely filed. The judgment is definitive. This Court’s delay in responding to the finding was prompted by repeated efforts to have counsel for relator provide supplementation to complete the application.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.