State ex rel. Carter v. Criminal District Court, Section H
State ex rel. Carter v. Criminal District Court, Section H
564 So. 2d 333
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
State ex rel. Carter v. Criminal District Court, Section H
Opinion of the Court
In re Carter, Charles R; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory
The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he claims to have filed on or about January 2, 1990. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.