Champagne v. Celotex Corp.
Champagne v. Celotex Corp.
565 So. 2d 425; 1990 La. LEXIS 1678; 1990 WL 91385
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Champagne v. Celotex Corp.
Dissenting Opinion
dissents from the order believing the trial court was correct and further that the trial court has authority to enforce the restrictions in CCP 1464 et seq.
Opinion of the Court
In re GAF Corporation; Keene Corporation; Quigley Company Inc.; — Defen
Granted. Ruling of trial judge granting the motion to quash is reversed. La.Code Civ.P. art. 1464 is not applicable. Trial judge shall issue a protective order to insure the integrity of the specimens.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.