Champagne v. Celotex Corp.

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Champagne v. Celotex Corp., 565 So. 2d 425 (La. 1990)
1990 La. LEXIS 1678; 1990 WL 91385
Watson

Champagne v. Celotex Corp.

Dissenting Opinion

WATSON, J.,

dissents from the order believing the trial court was correct and further that the trial court has authority to enforce the restrictions in CCP 1464 et seq.

Opinion of the Court

In re GAF Corporation; Keene Corporation; Quigley Company Inc.; — Defen*426dant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 87-6174; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA90-0393.

Granted. Ruling of trial judge granting the motion to quash is reversed. La.Code Civ.P. art. 1464 is not applicable. Trial judge shall issue a protective order to insure the integrity of the specimens.

Reference

Full Case Name
Homer CHAMPAGNE v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
Status
Published