Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1991

State ex rel. King v. State

State ex rel. King v. State
Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided May 7, 1991
578 So. 2d 936; 1991 La. LEXIS 1380; 1991 WL 74891 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

State ex rel. King v. State

Opinion of the Court

In re King, Andrew; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 3-73-3516.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed on or about February 28, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.