State ex rel. Woodcock v. State
State ex rel. Woodcock v. State
581 So. 2d 665; 1991 La. LEXIS 1798; 1991 WL 102373
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
State ex rel. Woodcock v. State
Opinion of the Court
In re Woodcock, George Jr.; — Plaintiffs); applying for writ of mandamus and supervisory and/or remedial writ.; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “I”, No. 275-167.
The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for new trial he has filed on or about February 19, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.