Rodrigue v. Rodrigue
Cases that cite this one
18 later published cases cite this decision.
- State of Louisiana v. Messiah Owney (La. 2026)
- Martin C. Willrige, III. v. Letitia B. Willrige (La. Ct. App. 2023)
- Robinson v. Department of Police (La. Ct. App. 2013)
- Clark v. Department of Police (La. Ct. App. 2013)
- Louisiana-Annunciation Condominium Association, Inc. v. Kathryn L. Kennedy (La. Ct. App. 2023)
- Jamie LaBranche v. Louisiana Department of Justice AG Jeff Landry (La. Ct. App. 2022)
- Drake Landry v. Tabitha Landry (La. Ct. App. 2021)
- Gerald J. Calogero v. USA Agencies Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. (La. Ct. App. 2019)
- Lingo v. Lingo (La. Ct. App. 2018)
- Devereux v. Atkins (La. Ct. App. 2017)
- First Bank & Trust v. Simmons (La. Ct. App. 2015)
- Rodgers v. Rodgers (La. Ct. App. 2015)
- Byrd v. Department of Police (La. Ct. App. 2013)
- Jackson v. Pfeifer (La. Ct. App. 2013)
- HISTORIC RESTORATION v. RSUI Indem. Co. (La. Ct. App. 2007)
- Marmer v. Queen of New Orleans (La. Ct. App. 2001)
- Ganey v. RMH Cable, Inc. (La. Ct. App. 1999)
- Morris v. Stewart (La. Ct. App. 1993)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Reynold J. RODRIGUE
v.
Elodie Lecompte RODRIGUE
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff's writ application is granted. The judgment of the court of appeal holding that Local Rule 22 of the Rules of the Thirty-Second Judicial District Court is not in conflict with the provisions of Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 1312 is hereby reversed. 588 So.2d 1180. The requirements of delivery or mailing of all pleadings under Local Rule 22 constitutes service under Code of Civil Procedure article 1313. Article 1312 specifically exempts any pleading not required by law to be in writing from service. Code of Civil Procedure article 1701 provides that preliminary defaults may be obtained by oral motion in open court or by written motion. Since local rules of court cannot conflict with legislation, see Trahan v. Petroleum Cas. Co., 250 La. 949, 200 So.2d 6 (1967), Local Rule 22 of the Thirty-Second Judicial District Court is hereby declared null and *1172 void to the extent it conflicts with Code of Civil Procedure article 1312. The judgment of default entered by the trial court is hereby reinstated.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.