Stiles v. K Mart Corp.
Cases that cite this one
68 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Hoskin v. Plaquemines Parish Government (La. Ct. App. 1997)
- Salgado v. Electric Insurance Company (District Court, M.D. Louisiana 2020)
- Menard v. Lafayette Insurance Co. (La. 2010)
- McBride v. Lichtenstein (La. Ct. App. 2018)
- McBride v. Lichtenstein (La. Ct. App. 2018)
- Levy v. Lewis (La. Ct. App. 2017)
- LeBlanc v. City of Abbeville (La. Ct. App. 2018)
- Riley Leblanc v. City of Abbeville (La. Ct. App. 2018)
- D'AMBROSIA v. Lang (La. Ct. App. 2008)
- Fusilier v. Dauterive (La. Ct. App. 2001)
- Huntley v. 21st Century Premier Insurance Co. (La. Ct. App. 2016)
- Brittainey Huntley v. 21st Century Premier Insurance Company (La. Ct. App. 2016)
- DUNOMES v. Plaquemines Parish Government (La. Ct. App. 2009)
- Hanks v. Seale (La. 2005)
- Domangue v. Mr. Gatti's, Inc. (La. Ct. App. 1995)
- Richard v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. (La. Ct. App. 1995)
- Brumfield v. Guilmino (La. Ct. App. 1994)
- Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. (La. 1993)
- Derrick Mills Versus Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. (La. Ct. App. 2025)
- Derrick Mills Versus Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. (La. Ct. App. 2025)
- Cy Williams Versus Mathew Alexander, III and Roussel Farms, Inc. (La. Ct. App. 2025)
- Majoue v. Play 8 Ltd. Inc. (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 2024)
- Robert Broussard and R.J. Broussard General Contractors Inc. v. Multi-Chem Group, LLC (La. Ct. App. 2021)
- Berry v. Anco Insulations (La. Ct. App. 2019)
- Berry v. Anco Insulations (La. Ct. App. 2019)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Muriel STILES
v.
K MART CORPORATION.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
*1013 PER CURIAM.
The application is granted.
When the record establishes that future medical expenses will be necessary and inevitable, the court should not reject an award of future medical expenses on the basis that the record does not provide the exact value of the necessary expenses, if the court can examine the record and determine from evidence of past medical expenses and other evidence a minimum amount that reasonable minds could not disagree will be required. La.Code of Civ. Proc. art. 2164.
The judgment of the court of appeal as to future medical expenses is set aside, and the case is remanded to the court of appeal to fix an award for future medical expenses which the medical evidence established that plaintiff, more probably than not, will be required to incur.
COLE, J., would deny the application.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.