State v. $126,053.00 U.S. Currency, Cellular & Radar Detector
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Nourallah (La. Ct. App. 1998)
- State v. $107,156 U.S. Currency Seized, from Marlin Morton & Richard Woods (La. Ct. App. 2006)
- State v. Nourallah (La. 1998)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Granted and remanded to the district court which is ordered to conduct an immediate evidentiary hearing on the forfeiture and to decide whether the state’s delay in filing a forfeiture proceeding or in holding a forfeiture trial violated the relator’s state or federal rights to due process of law in light of United States v. $8,850, 461 U.S. 555, 76 L.Ed.2d 143, 103 S.Ct. 2005 (1983); United States v. Banco Cafetero Panama, 797 F.2d 1154 (2d Cir. 1986); see also D.B. Smith, Prosecution and Defense of Forfeiture Cases § 12.01 et seq. discussing undue delay in seeking forfeiture generally. Otherwise Denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.